Versioning Policy

Site is still in beta and will be versioned to 1.0.0 on 20-April-2025

Structured Evolution of the Vibe Programming Framework


A consistent versioning approach is essential for framework evolution, adoption planning, and backward compatibility. This policy establishes clear guidelines for how the Vibe Programming Framework is versioned, what each version change signifies, and how users can effectively navigate framework updates.

Semantic Versioning Approach

The Vibe Programming Framework follows semantic versioning (SemVer) principles with format MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH:

Version Number Components

  • MAJOR version (X.0.0): Incremented for backward-incompatible changes that require significant adaptation. Major versions may introduce fundamental shifts in framework philosophy or structure.

  • MINOR version (0.X.0): Incremented when adding functionality in a backward-compatible manner. Minor versions enhance the framework without breaking existing implementations.

  • PATCH version (0.0.X): Incremented for backward-compatible bug fixes, documentation improvements, or minor refinements that don't add new functionality.

Pre-release Identifiers

Pre-release versions use the following additional identifiers:

  • Alpha (1.0.0-alpha.1): Early development versions with potentially unstable features, primarily for framework contributors and early testing.

  • Beta (1.0.0-beta.1): Feature-complete versions undergoing broader testing, suitable for early adopters comfortable with potential changes.

  • Release Candidate (1.0.0-rc.1): Versions considered stable unless significant issues are discovered, appropriate for implementation planning.

Component Versioning

Individual framework components may evolve at different rates. The framework uses the following approach to component versioning:

Core Components

Core components (Prompt Engineering System, Verification Protocols, Security Toolkit, Documentation Standards) share the framework's primary version number to ensure compatibility.

Extension Components

Extension components or specialized implementations may have independent version numbers while indicating compatibility with specific framework versions:

Component: Security Toolkit Extensions
Version: 2.3.0
Compatible with Framework: 1.x.x

Templates and Tools

Templates, examples, and tools are versioned independently but indicate minimum framework version requirements:

Template: Enterprise Governance Templates
Version: 1.2.0
Requires Framework: ≥1.2.0

Backward Compatibility Commitments

The framework makes the following versioning commitments to users:

  1. PATCH Versions: 100% backward compatible - no adaptation required.

  2. MINOR Versions: Backward compatible for core functionality; new features may require opt-in implementation but won't break existing usage.

  3. MAJOR Versions: May require adaptation, with clearly documented migration paths and transitional support for at least two minor release cycles.

Deprecation Policy

Before removing or significantly altering features, the framework follows a structured deprecation process:

  1. Notice Phase: Features marked as deprecated with alternatives documented (minimum one minor version)

  2. Warning Phase: Usage triggers explicit warnings with migration guidance (minimum one minor version)

  3. Removal Phase: Feature removed after completing both prior phases, coinciding with a major version release

LTS (Long-Term Support) Versions

Select framework versions receive extended support as LTS releases:

  • LTS versions are designated approximately once per year

  • LTS support includes security updates and critical bug fixes for 24 months

  • Organizations requiring stability are encouraged to implement LTS versions

Version Documentation

Each release includes comprehensive documentation of changes:

Changelog Structure

  • Added: New features or components

  • Changed: Changes to existing functionality

  • Deprecated: Features that will be removed in upcoming releases

  • Removed: Features removed in this release

  • Fixed: Bug fixes

  • Security: Security vulnerability fixes

Migration Guides

Major and significant minor releases include detailed migration guides with:

  • Step-by-step adaptation instructions

  • Compatibility tooling where applicable

  • Case studies of successful migrations

Framework Evolution Governance

The framework's version advancement follows a governed process:

  1. RFC Process: Significant changes require a Request for Comments period

  2. Community Input: Version planning incorporates user feedback and needs

  3. Release Scheduling: Predictable release cadences for each version type:

    • Patch: As needed for fixes (typically monthly)

    • Minor: Quarterly releases for enhancements

    • Major: Annual consideration based on evolution needs

Version Selection Guidance

Organizations should consider the following when selecting framework versions:

Innovation-Focused Implementations

  • Latest minor versions to access new capabilities

  • Consider beta releases for competitive advantage

  • Plan for quarterly adaptation cycles

Stability-Focused Implementations

  • LTS versions for maximum stability

  • Plan for annual major version evaluations

  • Adopt minor versions after initial release stabilization

Regulated Environment Implementations

  • LTS versions with security patches

  • Formal evaluation process for version advancement

  • Documented version validation process

Getting Started with Version Management

To effectively manage framework versions in your implementation:

  1. Document your current framework version in your implementation documentation

  2. Subscribe to framework release notifications

  3. Establish a version evaluation process for your organization

  4. Incorporate version updates into your regular maintenance cycles

  5. Contribute feedback to framework evolution through the community channels

Next Steps

As you implement version management:

  • Explore Contribution Guidelines for participating in framework evolution

  • Learn about the Roadmap for upcoming version developments

  • Discover Community Resources for version-specific support

Remember: Effective version management balances innovation adoption with implementation stability. By following these versioning policies, you can confidently evolve your implementation alongside the framework itself.

Last updated